Monthly Archives: August 2016

Functioning ‘Mechanical Gears’ seen in Nature for the First Time

functioningm

God Questions – Part 1

There was an article entitled Functioning ‘Mechanical Gears’ seen in Nature for the First Time’. It began as follows:

This image shows cog wheels connecting the hind legs of the plant hopper, a plant-hopping insect found in gardens across Europe – has hind-leg joints with curved cog-like strips of opposing ‘teeth’ that intermesh, rotating like mechanical gears to synchronise the animal’s legs when it launches into a jump.

The finding demonstrates that gear mechanisms previously thought to be solely man-made have an evolutionary precedent. Scientists say this is the “first observation of mechanical gearing in a biological structure“.

Through a combination of anatomical analysis and high-speed video capture of normal Issus movements, scientists from the University of Cambridge have been able to reveal these functioning natural gears for the first time. The findings are reported in the latest issue of the journal Science…” CONTINUED >

 

I commented: “These gears are not designed; they are evolved” … Or rather- “These gears are ‘evolved’… by The Designer…”

Continue reading

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Atheism

The Prophet’s Two-Day Fast

Good_Food_Display_-_NCI_Visuals_Online

An interesting phenomenon that I’ve noticed keeps occurring is how there are Islamic injunctions that Muslims are pretty familiar with. And then lo and behold, some extraneous discovery occurs in the secular world that ends up supplying further proofs of the benefits of the practice of Qu’ran, Sunnah from the Traditional Islamic milieu.

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under #Islam Vindicated, The Prophet's Words

Marrying Aisha (May Allah be pleased with her) without a Modern Misunderstanding

SHORT ANSWER: What exactly is the issue that some have with the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his marriage with Aisha (May Allah be pleased with her)? Quite simply, it is that she was allegedly a child when he consummated his marriage with her. But this assertion is wrong. She wasn’t a child. She was someone who was appropriately able to marry. This is the misunderstood point.

End of discussion. Next question.

“Wait, wait!” someone might say. “This isn’t a sufficient explanation!”

O.K. Let me elaborate:

Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Thought-Comments